Some cases parallel to child sexual abusing

VISION FOR ALL

• 270 Posts
• 28 Comments

Now there are some cases parallel to child sexual abusing case.If i would be wrong,then i must be prosecuted under child sexual abusing case.But by medical check up,this is obvioused that i am not wrong.So those who trapped me,must be prosecuted parallel to child sexual abusing case. They are not only parallel to rapist but they are parallel to killer.They raped as well as killed me in the sense of effect.I am only surviving in the search of justice.So they all must be prosecuted parallel to child sexual abusing act.
In this regard,the case no -2 against principal that principal trapped me by creating conspiracy,must be observed that principal did parallel to child sexual abusing to me.
This is right that the wrong deeds of everyone from case no 48 to 85 are due to principal.Principal motivated or helplessed them externally.But they have settled mentalies of familism,nepotism and casteism etc,etc and these mentalities interally motivated them to trap me.So for my trapping by them,they must be prosecuted personally also.
In this regard,following are offenders:-
Aditya Manher
Amrish Kumar
Awadesh Kumar
Pankaj Kumar
Balendu Prasad Singh
Nisha Kumari
Pintu Kumari[Sanjeev’s mother]
Regarding Aditya Manher
As if he had feeling parallel to the feeling of untouchability so only sleeping can be sexual activity in his view.He had not eye witness.He had no any evidence.He didn’t complain about such many sleepings. So he trapped me due to his personal problems from me.
In this view of matter,he must be prosecuted for:-
86.Bahaving parallel to child sexual abusing by trapping me.
Regarding Amrish Kumar
As if he also had feeling parallel to the feeling of untouchability so only sleeping can be sexual activity in his view.So he immediately complaint to principal and called his mother irrespective of considering all round torturing and sleeping between other boys except between myself and Sanjeev.So he trapped me due to his personal problems from me.
In this view of matter,he must be prosecuted for:-
87.Bahaving parallel to child sexual abusing by trapping me.
Regarding Awadesh Kumar
When my father said principal to listen the statement of Sanjeev that he used to see me at morning,Awadesh Kumar strated to say that he used to see me at morning.In his view,seeing at morning was competent enough to trap me.So he cooperated in principal’s conspiracy due to his personal problems from me and impressive nature to principal.
In this view of matter,he must be prosecuted for:-
88.Bahaving parallel to child sexual abusing by cooperaing in trapping me.
Regarding Pankaj Kumar
When my father said principal to listen the statement of Sanjeev that he used to see me at morning,Pankaj Kumar strated to say that he used to see me at morning.In his view,seeing at morning was competent enough to trap me.So he cooperated in principal’s conspiracy due to his personal problems from me and impressive nature to principal.
In this view of matter,he must be prosecuted for:-
89.Bahaving parallel to child sexual abusing by cooperaing in trapping me.
Regarding Balendu Prasad Singh
On 14 Sept 2011,by telling a lie against me,he tried to present myself wrong without any evidence.So he cooperated in principal’s conspiracy due to his personal problems from me and impressive nature to principal.
In this view of matter,he must be prosecuted for:-
90.Bahaving parallel to child sexual abusing by cooperaing in trapping me.
Regarding Nisha Kumari
On 14 Sept 2011,she cooperated principal by didn’t give me opportunity to cross question with Vishal.So she cooperated in principal’s conspiracy due to her connectivity as well as impressive nature to principal.
In this view of matter,he must be prosecuted for:-
91.Bahaving parallel to child sexual abusing by cooperaing in trapping me.
Regarding Pintu Kumari
She showed his dominancy as a mother and captured the genuine right of his son.She trapped me for the house changing of his son without any eye witness and evidence.That’s why she didn’t come for justification when i called her.She wanted his son’s house changing and she had settled mentalities in the sense of friendship between a juniour and a senior.That’s why she didn’t consider about Sanjeev’s sleeping with others and all round torturing created for Sanjeev.Even Sanjeev himself had said her about torturing on 8 March 2011 but she said that his son didn’t inform her.She said so because she had settled mentalities only in the context of my friendship and ,due to this,she did wrong by only trapping me.But there is no relationship of this trapping by her mother from principal’s trapping because principal trapped me after complaining against him and according to his mind-composed idea.Even she started to clarify her errors when i flew away.So if there would be no principal’s unsociality then i would be living in school without any objecion and as usual.So she can be prosecuted only on the basis of all happenings before my absconding and only in the case when she doesn’t apologize for trapping me because there is no relationship of his mother complaining from the principal’s conspiracy of 14 Sept 2011.
So if she doesn’t apologize,then she must be prosecuted for:-
92.Bahaving parallel to child sexual abusing by trapping me.